This article examines xAI’s constitutional challenge to Minnesota’s AI “nudification” law, exploring how the case could shape the future of AI regulation, First Amendment protections, provider liability, and compliance obligations for businesses developing or deploying generative AI.
This article explains why recent changes to the EU AI Act should not be mistaken for regulatory relief, examining how the EU Digital Omnibus shifts implementation timelines while leaving key transparency, disclosure, and GDPR obligations in place for companies operating in European markets.
This article highlights Eric Postow’s guest column on autonomous vehicles, exploring why the future of self-driving technology depends less on individual vehicles and more on the interconnected systems of infrastructure, regulation, data governance, and urban planning that enable them.
Holon Law Partners welcomes Rita Dienes, Esq., CIPP/E, AIGP, whose experience inside European Union institutions and deep knowledge of GDPR, the EU AI Act, and cross-border regulatory strategy strengthens the firm’s ability to advise clients navigating AI governance and international data privacy compliance.
Cities across America are quietly building AI-enabled intelligence infrastructure. The technology promises efficiency and public safety, but it also raises fundamental questions about data ownership, accountability, and citizen rights.
Federal agencies are making one point clear: employers remain responsible for AI-driven hiring and employment decisions, even when vendors supply the technology.
This article explains why AI-enabled transactions require a fundamentally expanded diligence framework, covering training data provenance, model licensing, AI governance, privacy compliance, and regulatory exposure under frameworks such as the EU AI Act.
This article explains how state-led regulatory sandbox programs are shaping the development of AI governance in the United States, highlighting how controlled testing environments are influencing liability, oversight, and the future of real-world AI deployment.
This article explains why traditional trademark clearance processes are no longer sufficient in an AI-driven environment, outlining how AI-generated branding, multilingual risk, and feature-level naming are reshaping how businesses must evaluate trademark availability and risk.
This article analyzes the preliminary injunction issued in Baron App, Inc. d/b/a Cameo v. OpenAI, Inc., explaining how the court applied traditional trademark doctrine to a feature-level brand name within an AI product and what the ruling signals for AI companies developing consumer-facing tools in adjacent digital markets.