This article examines Lisandrillo v. Palozzi and the emerging question of whether courts should focus on how legal writing appears to have been produced or on the lawyer’s independent judgment, reasoning, record support, and responsibility for the final filing.
This article examines how courts and bar authorities in Connecticut, D.C., Virginia, North Carolina, Maryland, New York, and Colorado are developing jurisdiction-specific rules for lawyers using generative AI, while converging on common duties of verification, candor, supervision, confidentiality, and professional judgment.
This article examines the growing body of federal cases involving AI-assisted legal filings and explains the practical rulebook courts are developing around verification, supervision, reasonable inquiry, and candor when attorneys use generative AI.